Refugee camps often evoke images of heart-wrenching tragedy and suffering — stark white tents scattered across barren landscapes, muddy paths, overcrowded spaces, and the sound of distressing stories on TV. Growing up, I remember seeing these images on WaterAid adverts, where the focus was on the urgent need for water, sanitation, and basic living conditions. They always seemed distant, almost like something happening in far-off places that felt disconnected from my everyday life.

But today, as we watch the news — especially with the ongoing crisis in Gaza — these images of refugee camps dominate our screens. Only now, they feel different. The scale of displacement and the severity of humanitarian needs have shifted, yet the fundamental nature of a refugee camp remains the same: a place of refuge, but also one of uncertainty.

So, what exactly are refugee camps, and why do they exist? To really understand them, we need to look beyond the advertisements and news reports. It’s crucial to grasp what a “camp” is in the first place, the different types that exist, and the complex laws that govern them. In this post, we’ll dive into what makes a refugee camp, how they operate, and why the reality we see today is so different from the one we might have imagined as children.

The Basics of a Camp

In its most basic sense, a “camp” is simply a place where people are gathered, usually in response to an emergency or crisis. These camps can take many forms, each with its own purpose and set of rules. The legal protections and rights granted to the people within these camps can vary significantly, depending on the type of camp and the laws that apply to it.

It’s important to understand the difference between spontaneous and forced gatherings, as well as open and closed camps. Spontaneous camps are typically set up by people themselves in the face of immediate danger or displacement, often in response to a sudden crisis like war or natural disasters. Forced camps, on the other hand, are those where individuals are compelled by authorities to gather in one place, sometimes under duress or as a form of control. The nature of the camp — whether open (allowing people to come and go freely) or closed (restricting movement and often monitored by authorities) — also plays a significant role in shaping the experience of those living there.

What Is a Refugee Camp?

A refugee camp is a temporary settlement established to house individuals who have been forced to flee their home countries due to war, persecution, or natural disasters. These individuals, known as refugees, seek asylum in another country, usually a neighbouring nation, where they hope to find safety and basic humanitarian support. Most people in refugee camps have fled violent conflicts, ethnic persecution, or severe instability, making these camps a crucial form of immediate protection.

Refugee camps are primarily set up and managed by the government of the host country, in coordination with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The UNHCR plays a central role in ensuring the protection, assistance, and legal rights of displaced people. These camps provide essential services such as shelter, food, medical care, and sanitation. However, while they are designed to offer temporary relief, they are not intended to be permanent homes. The ultimate goal is to help refugees either return safely to their home country when conditions improve or resettle in another country where they can rebuild their lives.

The Legal Framework of Refugee Camps

To ensure the safety of refugees, international law mandates that refugee camps be located a reasonable distance from active conflict zones — particularly from the borders of the refugees’ country of origin. This requirement, outlined in the 1969 Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa, prevents camps from becoming military targets or being misused for armed conflict.

The protection of refugee camps is further reinforced by UN Security Council Resolution 1208 (1998), which emphasizes the importance of maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of these settlements.

The primary legal frameworks governing refugee camps include:

• The 1951 Refugee Convention (which defines refugee rights and host country obligations).
• The 1969 OAU Refugee Convention (specific to African refugee crises).

One of the key principles in refugee law is non-refoulement, which prohibits the forced return of refugees to a country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom. The UNHCR ensures that refugees have access to asylum procedures if they do not wish to return home.

It’s important to note that being in a refugee camp does not automatically grant official refugee status under the 1951 Convention. In cases of mass displacement, entire groups may receive temporary protection without undergoing individual asylum assessments. While this grants them access to basic aid, it often limits their legal rights. In some cases, the UNHCR issues individual refugee cards, which serve as identity documents and may offer limited freedoms.

Refugee camps are a temporary response to humanitarian emergencies. However, many refugees remain in these camps for years, sometimes even decades, due to prolonged crises and political barriers to resettlement or repatriation.

Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)

Not everyone in camps qualifies as a refugee. Some are internally displaced persons (IDPs) — people forced to flee their homes due to conflict, persecution, or disaster but who have not crossed an international border.

Unlike refugees, who receive legal protection under international conventions, IDPs remain under the jurisdiction of their own national government. This distinction greatly impacts the assistance and rights available to them.

While IDPs may receive aid from international organizations, their protection depends on their government’s policies. Unlike refugee camps, which fall under the UNHCR’s mandate, no single international agency is dedicated to IDPs. Instead, their well-being is governed by domestic law, with occasional intervention based on international human rights standards.

Some IDPs are returnees — former refugees who have returned to their home country. The UNHCR may offer limited protection to returnees, but only if agreements exist between the organization and the state. These agreements vary widely and do not always guarantee long-term security.

Camps and International Humanitarian Law

Refugee camps — and camps for internally displaced persons — are protected under international humanitarian law (IHL).

However, not all camps are legally permitted. While camps for prisoners of war (POWs) and civilian internees may be allowed under specific conditions, other types are strictly prohibited:

• Concentration camps
• Forced labor camps
• Extermination camps

These were historically used as tools of oppression, forced labor, and genocide. International law explicitly forbids their existence and condemns the use of forced civilian gathering for military or political purposes.

Governments are legally responsible for ensuring the safety and well-being of displaced persons within camps, including providing adequate shelter, food, and medical care. While NGOs and international organizations assist with aid, the ultimate duty falls on host states.

Conclusion

A refugee camp is a temporary settlement designed to provide immediate relief to those forced to flee their homes due to war, violence, or crises. These camps, managed by governments and the UNHCR, are governed by international law to ensure safety and protection. However, life in a refugee camp is often difficult, and many displaced people remain in limbo for years.

While refugee camps serve as crucial humanitarian responses, they are not long-term solutions. The ultimate goal is to find permanent, dignified resettlement — whether through voluntary repatriation, integration into host countries, or resettlement elsewhere.

At their core, refugee camps are not just places of survival; they are spaces where the rights, dignity, and future of displaced people are shaped by the actions of governments, organizations, and global policies. Understanding their complexities is essential for creating a world that respects the rights of refugees and ensures their well-being in times of crisis.

‍

Oftentimes, the term “refugee” is accompanied by a photo like the one above: children with big, sparkly eyes and enigmatic smiles hiding painful truths. While these images may be powerful and evocative, revealing the harsh realities faced by millions around the world, they fail to capture the full scope of the 122.6 million people worldwide who are forcibly displaced. Behind every image is a complex web of legal definitions, political narratives, and deeply personal stories that shape our understanding of what it means to be a refugee.

The word “refugee” carries immense weight and has different meanings for different people. To organizations like the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), it is a precise legal term aimed at aiding humanitarian efforts by categorizing forms of displacement. To voters and politicians, it often becomes a political term, encapsulating snappy but polarizing slogans such as “stop the boats” or “build a wall,” which assign different agendas to displaced communities. For displaced individuals, it is also a descriptor — a term laden with both loss and resilience. To truly understand the breadth of this term, it is crucial to unpack its various dimensions: legal, political, and personal.

As Dantas (2023) notes, “The term refugee is not new. One of the first groups of displaced people considered refugees was the Huguenots, who fled France in the late 17th century because of religious persecution.” Indeed, the term has a long history of describing populations who flee conflict and persecution, often as a means of escaping death. From the Huguenots to modern-day Syrians, Afghans, and Venezuelans, the term has consistently marked the intersection of human vulnerability and resilience.

Legal Definition

The 1951 Refugee Convention is the cornerstone of the modern legal definition of a refugee. It defines a refugee as:

“Someone who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion.”

This definition established a crucial framework for identifying and protecting individuals fleeing persecution. It enshrined the principle of non-refoulement, which prohibits states from returning refugees to territories where they face serious threats to their life or freedom. The convention also laid out the rights of refugees and the obligations of states to provide them with safety.

However, the process of determining whether someone meets this definition can be highly bureaucratic and contentious. Refugee status determination often involves lengthy interviews, extensive documentation, and an assessment of whether the fear of persecution is truly “well-founded.” This process, while necessary for upholding international standards, can create barriers for individuals in urgent need of protection. It also leaves many people in limbo, awaiting decisions that could determine the course of their lives.

Moreover, the legal definition does not account for those displaced by factors such as climate change, economic instability, or generalized violence — categories often referred to as “grey areas.” While these individuals may not meet the strict criteria of the 1951 Convention, they too face immense challenges and require international attention. As the world grapples with evolving crises, some scholars and advocates argue for an expanded definition of “refugee” to reflect these realities.

A Political Tool

While the legal framework aims to protect refugees, the term “refugee” has also become a political tool. It is only since the invention of the passport and the solidification of borders that the concept of “refugee” has taken on its modern political significance. Borders delineate sovereignty, and within this framework, the movement of refugees often sparks debates about immigration, national identity, and security.

As Al Waer (2023) observes, refugees are “people with no political identity, very limited political rights, and with little certainty about where they will stay.” This statelessness makes refugees particularly vulnerable to being used as symbols in broader political debates. For some, the term “refugee” evokes a moral imperative to provide sanctuary and uphold human rights. For others, it becomes a flashpoint for fear and division, fuelling exclusionary policies and rhetoric.

In political discourse, refugees are often reduced to numbers or stereotypes. They are framed either as victims deserving of charity or as threats to economic stability and cultural cohesion. For example, slogans like “stop the boats” and “build a wall” encapsulate a vision of refugees as invaders, diverting attention from the systemic issues driving displacement. These narratives can overshadow the individual stories of loss, resilience, and hope that define the refugee experience.

This politicization has real-world consequences. Policies shaped by fear and exclusion can lead to restrictive asylum systems, detention centres, and pushbacks at borders. These measures not only violate international law but also compound the suffering of those already fleeing unimaginable circumstances. On the other hand, some nations have embraced refugees as contributors to society, recognizing their potential to enrich communities culturally and economically. The dichotomy highlights the power of political narratives in shaping public perceptions and policies.

A Deeply Personal Descriptor

Beyond its legal and political dimensions, the term “refugee” is also a deeply personal descriptor. For those who identify as refugees, it can carry a sense of shared experience and resilience. It acknowledges the challenges of displacement and the courage required to rebuild one’s life in unfamiliar circumstances. At the same time, it can also be a marker of loss — of home, community, and identity.

Dantas (2023) contextualizes this further, noting that populations such as the Huguenots and Jews escaping pogroms in the 19th century were considered refugees long before the advent of modern bureaucratic structures. These historical examples remind us that displacement is not a new phenomenon. What has changed is the way the term is framed and the implications it carries. For some, being labeled a refugee is empowering, signifying survival against the odds. For others, it is a source of stigma, reinforcing their exclusion from mainstream society.

The personal dimension of the term also highlights the diversity within refugee communities. Refugees come from different countries, cultures, and backgrounds, and their experiences of displacement vary widely. Some are forced to flee suddenly, leaving everything behind, while others endure protracted periods of instability before crossing borders. Recognizing this diversity is essential to understanding the human stories behind the label.

To truly grasp the complexities of the term “refugee,” we must move beyond simplistic definitions and narratives. Refugees are not just legal categories, political symbols, or abstract statistics — they are individuals with hopes, dreams, and agency. Their stories challenge us to confront uncomfortable truths about inequality, conflict, and our shared responsibility as global citizens.

Conclusion

The term “refugee” is far more than a label. It is a legal designation that provides a framework for protection, a political tool that shapes discourse and policy, and a personal identity that reflects both loss and resilience. Each of these dimensions offers valuable insights, but none can fully capture the complexity of the refugee experience. As we continue to grapple with the challenges of displacement, it is crucial to approach the topic with nuance, empathy, and a commitment to justice.

This blog post is just the beginning of a deeper exploration into the many facets of this term. In future posts, I will delve further into the legal frameworks, political debates, and personal stories that define what it means to be a refugee. For now, I hope this serves as a foundation for understanding the multifaceted nature of this important and timely issue.

‍